28th February 2008

2 Contests: Speaking & Evaluation

posted in Learning to Speak |

You might think the core focus of Toastmasters would be speaking, and you’d be right, but a big part of Toastmasters centres around evaluation too.

On Monday night, we had two contests, testing the club’s skills in both speaking and evaluation.

Evaluation is important as this is how we improve. If you’re making mistakes,  as a speaker you’re very often unaware of them. However, you do need to be told gently - public speaking is scary enough without having every fault dissected and analysed in front of the whole group. Considerate evaluation is an art.

In the evaluation contest, there was a single speech. Each evaluator made 5 minutes’ notes before their notebooks were taken away. Then, they were all taken to a side room, and asked to come out and give each their evaluation in turn (so they couldn’t hear their competitors’ comments).

For the speaking contest, speakers each delivered their chosen topics, with several judges for each speaker. On a normal evening, each speaker has a single evaluator - for the contest, the judges evaluate all speeches against set criteria. These points are added up, and the speaker with the best overall score wins.

Sheila gave a particularly memorable performance, based around “The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People”. I half expected her to tell us how to gear up to be more successful in business, but instead she told us to focus on the really important thing, making time for our friends and family. It was powerful stuff.

This is one of the things I like most about Toastmasters - you never know what the speakers will say. Or how it will affect you.

This entry was posted on Thursday, February 28th, 2008 at 9:54 am and is filed under Learning to Speak. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

There are currently 5 responses to “2 Contests: Speaking & Evaluation”

Why not let us know what you think by adding your own comment! Your opinion is as valid as anyone elses, so come on... let us know what you think.

  1. 1 On March 5th, 2008, Hubert said:

    Hey Colin,

    a very interesting read this is, am enjoying it a lot. Have not read through the whole lot yet but will do so over the next days/weeks (and will get updates via RSS). In case you stumble across a German equivalent of Toastmasters, please let me know…

    Keep up this excellent work
    Hubert

  2. 2 On March 6th, 2008, colin.macleod said:

    Hi Hubert,

    Thanks for the kind comments. Toastmasters is fairly active in Germany too, I think - though still in English.

    Cheers,
    Colin

  3. 3 On March 16th, 2008, tvsm22 said:

    It was nice reading this. But maybe you know whether there is Russian equivalent of Toastmasters ? Probably you don’t, but just in case :)

  4. 4 On March 16th, 2008, colin.macleod said:

    Hi tvsm22,

    Sorry - no I don’t know about a Russian equivalent, but Toastmasters is active in Russia in the English language:

    http://www.geocities.com/moscowtoastmasters/

  5. 5 On May 30th, 2008, Terry Gault said:

    Thanks for the post on Toast Master’s evaluation methods.

    Feedback is the primary tool we use to help bring more awareness to our dialogue, so presenters should always be receptive to the feedback we receive.

    As far back as Norbert Wiener’s pioneering work on computation systems in the 1950’s, feedback was a critical topic. It was defined as the ability of a machine to use the results of its own performance as self-regulating information so as to adjust itself as part of an on-going process.

    Feedback can be uncomfortable and can create intense internal conflict when our manufactured self image confronts the reality of how we are perceived by others.

    Commonly, our first response to this internal conflict is to explain how our behavior has been misinterpreted. If we can just get others to “understand,” we will have peace and our self-image is defended. Defensiveness is often our response to feedback.

    Overview Strategy for Receiving Feedback

    When receiving feedback we need to confront the ego’s natural tendency to defend itself.

    1. Develop your inner observer by noticing your reactions to feedback. One technique to consider is consciously “splitting your mind.” One part of your mind is devoted to observing your behavior while the other part is engaging in the behavior.

    2. Resist the powerful urge to explain yourself. “Well the reason that I did that was because. . .,” “That was because I . . ..” Explanations cut-off further feedback, they are interpreted as statements that you are not ready to hear anymore.

    3. Become a sponge. Silently absorb the comments using facial gestures and nodding of the head to acknowledge the feedback. Ask questions for understanding but do not comment upon the feedback. Simply absorb it all.

    4. Work to accept the feedback as possibly correct. Use the 1% rule (assume that all of the feedback is at least partially true, at least 1%). Often others can see us better than we can see ourselves.

    Feedback provides a powerful basis for improving skills and gives new insight.

    Thanks again for the post

Leave a Reply

Comment spam protected by SpamBam

  •  

  • February 2008
    M T W T F S S
    « Jan   May »
     123
    45678910
    11121314151617
    18192021222324
    2526272829  

Welcome to the Public Speaking Blog

Its a personal account. Starting with my very first meetings at Maidenhead Speakers Club, it takes you through the highs and lows, the challenges and rewards as I try to learn from each new step.

Note: I've made a point of only using first names on this site, to protect the guilty. If you see your name here and would rather I changed or removed something, please just let me know.

Add to Technorati Favorites